SANS 2025: New Research Reveals Why Negative News Headlines Get Clicked

Why does bad news grab (an keep!) our attention? New research from the Cognitive Communication Science Lab at UC Davis sheds light on how emotionally charged news headlines influence the way we make decisions.

At the 2025 Annual Meeting of the Social and Affective Neuroscience Society (SANS), Dr. Richard Huskey and collaborators are presenting findings from a two-part study that combines computational modeling and fMRI. The research shows that people are more likely to select news headlines that are negatively valenced and high in arousal. This preference is driven by faster evidence accumulation in the brain, measured by what decision scientists call drift rate, and is reflected in neural activity in key subcortical decision-making regions.

The team will present a Blitz Talk (Session #2) and a poster (P2-A-5) during SANS 2025 in Chicago on Friday, April 25.

Download the full poster here.

Poster titled “Negatively Valenced and High-Arousal News Headlines Drive Preferential Evidence Accumulation and Influence Selection” by Gong et al. Presented at the SANS 2025 Annual Meeting. The poster features four main sections: Background, Methods, Results, and Conclusions. The Background summarizes prior research on negativity bias and its political implications. The Methods section describes two studies: a behavioral study with 300 nationally representative participants and an fMRI study with 30 young adults (16 Democrats, 14 Republicans). Participants completed a two-choice task involving 140 economic news headlines generated and rated for emotional valence and arousal. The Results show that negatively valenced, high-arousal headlines produced faster evidence accumulation (higher drift rate), moderated by political ideology. fMRI results revealed subcortical brain activation (e.g., caudate, nucleus accumbens, thalamus) that correlated with drift rate. Graphs display estimated drift rates across political groups and brain activity contrasts for valence and arousal. The Conclusions highlight that, when arousal and valence are statistically separated, both drive preference, supporting a value-based model of decision making. Institutional affiliations and references are listed at the bottom.

Gong, X., Ulusoy, E., Riggs, E., Kee, R., Zhao, Z., Snyder, A., Coronel, J., Eden, A., Boydstun, A., & Huskey, R. (2025, April). Negatively Valenced and High-Arousal News Headlines Drive Preferential Evidence Accumulation and Influence Selection Behavior. SANS Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.

We’re at ICA 2024!

The lab is excited to share three presentations at ICA24 this year. Hope to see you there!

Does Cleft Repair Surgery Restore Normal Visual and Neural Responses to Infant Faces?
Rachael L. Kee; Kelly J. Jantzen; Amanda Hahn

What to Read Next: Reward Generalization, Exploration, and Foraging Shape Sequential Media Selection
Jason X. Gong; Richard Huskey

Moral Narrative Prediction Accuracy Systematically Varies Along an Audience Response Temporal Gradient
Matthew Grizzard; Lucy Brown; Jason X. Gong; Richard Huskey

LAB END OF THE YEAR PARTY, SPRING 2024

The Lab (clockwise from bottom left: Valerie Klein, Richard Huskey, Allyson Snyder, Ali Mehdizadeh, Sophia Sarieva, Rachael Kee, Raymond Kang, Wenjun Liu, Xiaobei Chen, Jason Gong) celebrated the end of the 2023 – 2024 academic year at Tres Hermanas.

We had a lot to celebrate! Jason earned his PhD in Communication, Ali earned his MA in Communication, Allyson earned her MA in Human Development, and Raymond earned his BS in Computer Science. Way to go!

Rachael Kee Wins NIH Dental & Craniofacial Research Building Bridges Award

Congratulations to Rachael Kee who earned the NIH Dental and Craniofacial Research Building Bridges award for her poster: Does Cleft Lip/Palate Repair Surgery Restore Normal Neural Processing For Infant Faces? She presented this research as a poster at the annual meeting of the Association for Psychological Science (APS24) in San Francisco. Way to go, Rachael!